LOOKING AT BELIEFOver the summer, my pal, Rebecca Stack (the other Rebecca), saw that I was stuck in a pattern of suffering and meaninglessness. My husband and I were quarrelling about the same old things -- over and over. She introduced me to
A Course in Miracles, a self-study guide on erasing erroneous, unhelpful, unhealthy beliefs and instilling and employing more truthful, useful and positive beliefs. That sounded pretty good.
So, I bought the book. I flipped through each of the lessons, reading only the main idea in each lesson, which is in bold at the top of the lesson. I shook my head here and there, but mostly nodded to myself and decided that I could see where the ideas went and then I put the book down. I thought that was enough. I "got" it. The direction it takes the student is from suffering to a belief that the world is full of love -- and therefore is filled with miracles. Brilliant! Has some holes, but on the whole, great!
Well, what I "got" was the main idea, the
essence -- but it turns out I did not "get" the real
substance. Rebecca said, "Beck, you need to
practice these lessons, not just read them."
"Oh, of course," I thought. This is the difference between thinking and doing -- the difference between book learning and experience -- or the difference between reading about a Law of Physics and conducting an experiment. So why not conduct a little
experiment...
PRACTICING BELIEFMy first attempt at study was rocky. I found myself reading a lesson though and arguing the concept. For example, in reading the first lesson,
Nothing I see in this room [on this street,
from this window, in this place] means anything.
"What can the author possibly mean that
nothing means anything?! That isn't
true!" I began writing comments in the margins: "What about ___ or _____!" I felt very passionate while writing these notes. I took the ideas to others, and they seemed to think I certainly made some pretty good points to the contrary.
I couldn't get past the feeling that what the author wanted me to do was ignore truth. I continued to write notes in the margin until I finally grew tired of it and put the book down. I proceeded to lose the book among papers and other miscellany. My expiriment failed.
Naturally, Rebecca asked for a report. "How's the Course coming?" she asked.
"It's not," I confessed.
BELIEFS UPON BELIEFSWhat I can see today is that I approached
A Course in Miracles with
Free Will -- a belief in itself. Without this belief, there would be nothing I can do to change anything. That's not very appealing. Whether or not my belief in free will contains complete truth (1), it serves me in being able to explore the ideas and lessons in
A Course in Miracles.
Beliving in Free Will precedes
the belief that I can choose how I experience life, and that I could choose a life that contained more meaning and less suffering -- not just for me, but for others as well. I would very much like to take Ghandi's advice and be the change I want to see in the world. However, the idea of Free Will was what made it sensible for me to even buy the book, let alone read it.
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE QUESTIONFor months, Rebecca shared her own story, and illustrated the patterns she saw and how the lessons in
A Course in Miracles applied. The more examples I had of these lessons working, the more I came to believe that there was
something missing.
And there
was something missing. My behavior exhibited how, by scribbling notes in the margins about my disagreements, I was diving immediately into skepticism. It wasn't that there was something missing in the
book. Turns out I was missing something.
It wasn't until Rebecca and I shared one of life's mysterious misunderstandings between us, and she applied a lesson. I got to see a real life example applied -- in action and my own behavior resulting -- an
experience. I got to see how quickly peace can come about from the work she's done. She was later able to tell me the story of that experience we shared and what lesson she applied. So I knew for a fact that the results of the experiment favored
The Course as Rebecca calls it. It works.
What was I missing?
And then one day, Rebecca and I were sitting at my dinning room table. We were sharing stories about how we've each been "left out" in one way or another. And she said, "I know I'm fun and smart, but I couldn't get why [a particular crowd]
couldn't see it in me."
AHA! WHAT WE LOOK FOR, WE WILL FINDI was
asking the wrong question all along. I was asking, "is this lesson true?" instead of "What is the truth in this lesson." Just like the [crowd] asked themselves, "Is Rebecca fun and smart?" instead of "What has Rebecca got that is fun and smart in her" and taken the time to be curious about her.
I was looking for
holes to feed my skeptical mind. I wasn't looking for
truth that would feed my spirit. I noticed how black-and-white the first question is -- you can only answer yes or no -- and how
open the second is. A person could write a novel.
MY PROGRESSI am currently
challenging old beliefs that appear to serve me. Just because a belief serves me does not mean it is truthful or positive or healthy for me or others around me. For example, suppose I'm driving along the highway and a driver cuts me off, I might believe he is a self-centered asshole, which makes me comparitively thoughtful and conscientious. It makes me feel good about myself; and therefore, it serves me -- or at least it appears to.
In actually, no negative beliefs serve me. It limits the world I live in. It requires another opposing entity for me to express who I am. It doesn't serve the driver or anyone else in the world for me to carry around the belief that some people are just like that. Holding on to a negative belief makes the world more ridgid and more difficult for me and others to operate in.
Furthermore, the belief that the driver is a self-centered asshole is simply not true. Maybe he was rushing to the bedside of his dying wife. Maybe he just didn't see me there and made a mistake.
Or maybe he was being a self-centered asshole. Either way, to see someone in a certain way puts them in a box so that we are unable to see their true self: what wonder they might become.
So, I've made a total committment to examining my beliefs. And it is the most difficult, most rewarding work I've ever done.
Thanks, Rebecca [Stack]
(1) I actually have a sense that Determinism contains truth. It is certainly possible that I was created to believe in Free Will. My husband, a philosopher himself, has brought to my senses the differentiation between the possible and the probable. Science seems to be the key to the probable (what we can see, what is most simple) -- as in Ockham's razor -- and Spirit, the key to the possible (what we cannot see, what could be even simpler than what we first thought). All I need to do is watch, Contact, one of my favorite movies to see the Truth contained in both philosophies.